Add to del.icio.us     Digg this

September 24, 2008

Early this morning, IBM has declared in a new corporate policy that it was working to establish new IT standards and redefining its current ties with the ISO (International Standards Organization). If developing countries want to develop their own standards, IBM is willing to support them.

As a whole, ramifications are pretty clear regarding the turbulent debate around the acceptance of Microsoft's Open Office XML (OOXML) data format. The new IBM standards are effective immediately, according to a recent press release... (!)

The IT giant states that its membership in the standards bodies is essentially on trial and that it will take "all necessary actions" to make this a go. The company emphasizes the importance of open standards and characterizes them as vital for open development and worldwide trade.

IBM has further addressed intellectual property rights and promised to set a good example: "IBM's new standards policy promotes simplified and consistent intellectual property practices, and emphasizes that all stakeholders, including the open source community and those in growth markets, should have equal footing as they participate in the standards process."

IBM's press release contains five tenets for the new policy. Attentive observers of the controversy around ISO certification of Microsoft's OOXML data format should not have a hard time making the necessary inferences: the first tenet basically declares that their participation in standards bodies is questionable "based on the quality and openness of their processes, membership rules, and intellectual property policies."

Overall ISO certification of OOXML ended up in a heated battle among international delegates, with many voting strongly against it. Among the sharpest critics was IBM delegate Rob Weir, who railed against the process in his blog.

IBM’s second policy tenet encourages developing countries "to both adopt open global standards and to participate" in their creation. The ISO delegates from Brazil, India, South Africa and Venezuela had petitioned against ISO's decision and in favor of the OOXML standard.

After rejection by the ISO and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), delegates voiced concerns that the appeal would have been different coming from the industrialized nations. Ideas also were vented about forming independent standards bodies outside ISO or IEC...

A thinly veiled broadside came from another of IBM's tenets on how standards should be set: to "advance governance rules within standards bodies that ensure technology decisions, votes, and dispute resolutions are made fairly by independent participants, protected from undue influence."

In two months, IBM plans an invitation-only summit under the auspices of Yale University to flesh out so-called recommendations from the debate.

IBM says that their principles were inspired by no less than 6 weeks of open discussion in the spring of this year. In May and June, IBM invited seventy independent, forward-thinking experts from academia, government, industry, public policy and standard-setting bodies to engage in a wiki forum discussion about whether the standard setting bodies have kept pace with today's current realities.

Source: IT Direction.

Add to del.icio.us     Digg this

ADVERTISERS:
Linux News Today.org is read by over 450,000 people involved in the field of Linux application development, professional Web hosting services, Linux security, Linux Web development, etc. Inquire about our reasonable advertising rates on our news website. One of our advertising representatives will be in touch with you. Simply email us to learn about our ad rates and how we can help drive relevant traffic to your website. Advertising space is limited.