Add to del.icio.us     Digg this

November 6, 2008

If a U.S. court has its way, it would make it a lot more difficult for software patent trolls to file for dubious patents and then make legal claims based on existing ones. In what has been dubbed the Bilski Case, a U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a ruling yesterday that redefined how software can be patented in the first place.

The case involves just how far a marketable idea can be protected, based on the patent filing of Bernard Bilski and Rand Warsaw, who had founded a company named Weatherwise and wanted to protect their ideas on processing weather risk data.

Some patent lawyers considered the case similar to one involving software. To present just such an argument in terms of Free and Open Source Software, Red Hat submitted an amicus curiae brief in response to the appeal, with the American Civil Liberties Union following up closely behind.

In the opinion of the law platform Groklaw, these briefs contributed considerably to the Bilski appeal ruling, with positive ramifications for free and open source software.

The court dropped the previous software patent criteria in favor of two new ones. To make a process patentable, they ruled, it must be "tied to a particular machine or apparatus" or it must "transform a particular article into a different state or thing."

Of course, depending on how broadly "tied to a particular machine" is interpreted, the effect could be significant for future patentability claims. If interpreted too broadly, tenuous ties between software and a general purpose computer would do little to discourage future patent claims.

But in the recent past, FOSS advocates cited previous patent cases where the "particular machine" argument as related to a general purpose computer failed to hold up in court. In the dissenting opinion of Bilski Judge Newman, "For the thousands of inventors who obtained patents under the court’s now-discarded criteria, their property rights are now vulnerable."

The judge's above statement is troublesome in the view of many FOSS advocates.

The Appeals Court rejected the Bilski appeal by ruling that the patent idea did not produce "useful, concrete and tangible results" and used this as a gauge for future patent considerations. FOSS representatives have felt that a lack of this gauge has led to countless frivolous patent applications in the past.

Although the court didn't settle the issue specifically of how or when software is patentable, it did pave the way by setting some new guidelines and criteria. Red Hat responded to the court decision and described its consequences for the FOSS community in a press release.

Still, FOSS lawyers see the decision as a good basis for changes to current software patent laws. They caution, however, that the industry will still have to think of increasing lobbying efforts from past patent seekers and "beneficiaries of the status quo."

But nevertheless, the Red Hat press release still ends on a positive note with "We have a battle before us, but it is a battle we can win."

Source: LNR.

Add to del.icio.us     Digg this

ADVERTISERS:
Linux News Today.org is read by over 450,000 people involved in the field of Linux application development, professional Web hosting services, Linux security, Linux Web development, etc. Inquire about our reasonable advertising rates on our news website. One of our advertising representatives will be in touch with you. Simply email us to learn about our ad rates and how we can help drive relevant traffic to your website. Advertising space is limited.